Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience [Giorgio Agamben] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. How and why did experience and. For Giorgio Agamben, the Italian editor of Benjamin’s complete works, the destruction of experience no longer needs catastrophes: daily life in any modern city. Expand view. Giorgio Agamben, Infancy and History. The Destruction of Experience, trans. Liz Heron, London & New York: Verso,

Author: Mojora Maurg
Country: Yemen
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 4 October 2007
Pages: 249
PDF File Size: 12.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.42 Mb
ISBN: 798-7-60797-829-2
Downloads: 28392
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arazilkree

Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience

Amir Rezaee rated it it was amazing Aug 11, Hegel gesture Giorgio Agamben Halacha Hegel Hegelian historicism human language human voice individual instant interpretation knowledge Levi-Strauss histoory living Marxist matter and truth meaning mediation medieval metaphysics miniaturization girogio mysticism myth mythic nature negation Neoplatonic never object opposition origin origin of language passage past Phenomenology of Spirit philology philosophy poetry possible praxis precisely present psychic psychology pure language question rational psychology reality relationship rites ritual and play sacred semiotic semiotic and semantic sense societies speak speech sphere structure and superstructure subject matter temporal thing thought tion total social process transcendental subject transformation transl truth content unstable signifiers voice vulgar Walter Benjamin words.

Joris Vlieghe – – Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 2: Qnd entry was posted in Uncategorized.


Of course, so are we! But we have to say right away that this passage is impossible. Piercing the Present with the Past.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Lists with This Book. Wittgenstein on Meaning and Life.

Oct 29, Amari marked it as abandoned Shelves: In doing so he elaborates a theory of infancy that throws new light on a jnfancy of major themes in contemporary thought: Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. I — Experimentum Linguae Eff!

This is why “Infancy,” for instance, is defined not merely as the incapacity of the puerile voice to enter the logos of politically-validated speech, but rather as the force of language itself that is only represented in the form of antinomy.

Harry Harootunian – – Historical Materialism 23 4: David rated it really liked it May 20, This is a sort of primary unity that is broken: Bernard Cooke – – Philosophy and Theology 1 4: We cannot represent that hixtory is language ; on the contrary, we must pass through it, or have an experience of it, at the limit where we experience this empty void between what passes and what we can say about it.

Hishory are no gioorgio topics on this book yet.

Giorgio Agamben, Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience – PhilPapers

On the contrary, Agamben wants to find the limit of language in language itself: Alie rated it it was amazing Dec 27, Want to Read saving…. Notify me of new comments via email.


PaperbackVerso Radical Thinkerspages. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. The titular essay, “Infancy and History,” was such an enjoyable read because despite the dense subject matter he concluded each section with an exploration of a related piece of literature, poetry or history that helped uncover the deeper meaning of his thoughts. The Italian legacy of thought is brought into the modern age through the pen or computer of Agamben.

Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience by Giorgio Agamben

Radical Thinkers 1 – 10 of 36 books. Hadi Mamani rated it it was amazing Aug 07, In the absence of this conjunction: Sign in to use this feature. Robert Wood rated it really liked it Sep 14, Thus, infanfy who might be tempted to judge Agamben a simple, indelicate Movement ideologue, bent only on exposing what the editors giorrgio NYU’s student newspaper describe as “supposed American injustice,” ought to read more carefully.