The term “superorganic” was probably first used by the early sociologist Herbert of the time, Alfred Kroeber and Edward Sapir, in the American Anthropologist. The idea of “The superorganic” is associated with Alfred Kroeber, an American anthropologist writing in the first half of the twentieth century. Why the Superorganic Concept Serves the Human Sciences Badly. Peter J. Richerson University of California – Los Angeles. Los Angeles . Dobzhansky’s usage was probably inspired Kroeber and kindred influential social. scientists of his.

Author: Voodoobei Samubei
Country: Singapore
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 28 August 2017
Pages: 181
PDF File Size: 5.87 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.44 Mb
ISBN: 888-7-43201-334-1
Downloads: 61022
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tagrel

Key Words Modules Sociology: It may have a life of its own, but its life more resembles an amoeba than a human. The second level of complexity is composed of living things. If we start with the inorganic, it is the physical universe, all the atoms of elements without life.



Do not anthropomorphise culture. The links are symbolic, not genetic as in biological systems. The superorganic is another way of describing —— and understanding —— culture or the socio-cultural system.


Similarly, the dog, if seen as a biological system, operates at a higher complexity than the inorganic elements which comprise it. The socio-cultural level, culture or society, therefore is carried by humans and transcends humans. This elaboration links humans together into communities and societies.

Knowing the dynamics of how carbon atoms operate, or that combining hydrogen and oxygen can result in a rapid combustion if not an explosion, does not explain how the tree works, with supeeorganico leaves converting sunlight into energy to change water and carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon, channels to transfer sap from leaves to root, and so on.

They behave, however, in concert with each other, as a system external to individuals —— society.

If you separate the dog or tree into its separate elements, it dies. Similarly, do not think of a community, an institution, a society as a human being. Looking at the relationship between living things and their inorganic components superorganicco this way helps us to understand the relationship between culture and persons. Those are carried by individuals.

Culture as the superorganic

Do not think of a dog as a carbon atom or a hydrocarbon molecule. Culture and society comprise the third level. All living things, plants lroeber animals, are built up of inorganic elements, mainly hydrogen, oxygen and carbon, plus some trace elements.


A living entity transcends its inorganic parts. It operates at a higher level of complexity than the organic. The arrangement makes them alive. Human beings are animals, and as such are organic systems. They have developed communications between themselves to an elaborate degree, much more sophisticated than other animals.

There is a parallel, therefore, in the relations between the inorganic and the organic, as between the organic and the superorganic.

If you analyse all those parts, in themselves, or even as a collection, they are not living. If you copy text from this site, please acknowledge the author s and link it back to cec.

Humans have thoughts and superorganic. We can call this the lowest level of complexity.